Why is the supposed "liberal" media making personal conjectures in news articles against Obama?

Bush did this kind of thing all the time when he did something the public wouldn't like and the Media NEVER called him on it. ""Obama's campaign disclosed the joint appearance — but offered few details — one day after announcing that he would reverse from an earlier position to reject some $85 million in public financing for the general election. That announcement opened him up to a flood of criticism and dominated the news cycle. *** Thus, Obama's campaign sought to redirect attention by putting word out a full seven days in advance that Obama and Clinton would campaign together. *** "" http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080620/ap_on_el_pr/obama_clinton_5 OK - she's a republican shill. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nedra_Pickler but why are they still publishing her biased articles?

Public Comments

1. ? ? ?
2. The news media is neither liberal nor conservative. The news media publishes whatever they feel will make them the most money by creating the most controversy.
3. I think it's interesting that the same opponents of Obama who warn that he will raise taxes are now criticizing him for NOT accepting tax money for his campaign.
4. Good morning Sunshine, it's time to wake up. The media has bashed Bush every opportunity they have had. Where have you been??? No one has ever been handled so softly as Barry/Barrack Hussein Obama, not even Bill Clinton's first run for President Oh yeah Nedra Pickler is a regular Republican shill, grew up in poverty in Arkansas. HAHAHA
5. Why would MSNBC post Obama's campaign phone number on Keith Olberman's show last night. I didn't see McCain's. I bet the media puts more emphasis on Obama and Clinton getting together than the public finance story.
6. Because Obama LIED to the people. He said he was going to take Public Funding and now he is bought by the corporate elite and wants to deflect attention from the fact that he told a bald face lie and there is no getting around it.
7. The media totally trashed Clinton which allowed Obama to run his campaign without him appearing to be negative because the media did his dirty work for him. They will not go negative against McCain like they did Clinton. They tried to psych Clinton out because she is a woman and based much of their negativety about her on the fact that she is a woman who MUST be subject to wicked emotions and motivations. ALL women are subject to that, RIGHT? Obama is, for the first time, going to have to campaign on his own merit. He's fair game now. He even signed a paper about the public funds and then went back on his word. That IS a big deal. The way the media and himself portrayed Clinton, I'm surprised he hasn't said she is just too old politics to be part of his campaign. Do they want her to do his dirty work now? Its only right if it helps HIM win?
8. there's no such thing as a "liberal" media. they proved it during the coverage of the Terri Schiavo incident. that fiasco put the final nail in the coffin of that myth. it is nearly impossible to find ANY article today, in print or otherwise, that does not contain personal conjecture. it's because the era we now live in can be defined by what we watch: it is the Era Of Reality TV. by allowing ourselves to be dumbed down to the point that we will even watch crap like "Dog the Bounty Hunter" and "What Not To Wear," we have made the media's job much easier for them. they no longer have to adhere to ANY sort of standards. they can now outright LIE on the television, like Brit Hume so loves to do. just stay smart, and try not to let it get to you too much... it's not likely to change.
9. There is nothing wrong with that AP story. That's exactly WHY the Obama campaign announced that Clinton appearance. They're scrambling for anything to distract the media from the unexpected barrage of negative reaction to Obama's decision not to honor his pledge to use public financing. Obama thought he was bulletproof but even the media that was in the tank for him is crying FOUL. That is very, very mild compared to what the liberal media outlets do the Republicans on a regular basis. At least it was yesterday. There will probably never be another story about Sen George Allen as long as he lives that doesn't mention "macaca," yet no one ever mentions "Abscam" in articles about the liberal Saint Rep. John Murtha. Forget Wiki. You must be aware that the content can be altered. In this case, it was obviously done by the Obama campaign whining about stories that hit a nerve. We should all be grateful that somebody in the media is finally telling the truth about the Great Fake from Chicago.